Bellevue, WA Fire Sprinker requirements for low voltage cabling
BICSI
Welcome to the New BICSI Forums Community

Note:
NEW UPDATE: The Public forums are now sorted in a new order for easy browsing. We also fixed the issue with uploading large attachments. If you need any assistance please contact technical@bicsi.org.

BICSI Forums Community
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      



Bellevue, WA Fire Sprinker requirements for low voltage cablingExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:49 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:00 PM
Posts: 2, Visits: 4
We are currently constructing a new store in Bellevue, WA.  All low voltage cabling has pasted electrical inspection and meets all NEC code.  However, the fire marshall has failed the cabling install in any areas where he sees a bundle of low voltage cable citing International Fire Code 7.06-6 (which Bellevue has adopted).  This states that any cable bundles exceeding 20 cables must be sprinkled or separated from other bundles by 24".  The fire marshall is only enforcing this in areas where the ceiling is not already installed.  The first fire inspector did not cite this code.  Right now we have to reroute the majority of cable on one floor.  This also applies to bundles entering into TR/ER locations.  Has any one else run into this situation?  We are too far along in construction to redesign sprinkler locations.

Are there any other municipalities that have adopted this code?

Thanks,

Elaine Curry

Post #2712
Posted Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:07 PM


Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:14 PM
Posts: 431, Visits: 2,214
elaine_curry@neimanmarcus.com (2/10/2009)
We are currently constructing a new store in Bellevue, WA.  All low voltage cabling has pasted electrical inspection and meets all NEC code.  However, the fire marshall has failed the cabling install in any areas where he sees a bundle of low voltage cable citing International Fire Code 7.06-6 (which Bellevue has adopted).  This states that any cable bundles exceeding 20 cables must be sprinkled or separated from other bundles by 24".  The fire marshall is only enforcing this in areas where the ceiling is not already installed.  The first fire inspector did not cite this code.  Right now we have to reroute the majority of cable on one floor.  This also applies to bundles entering into TR/ER locations.  Has any one else run into this situation?  We are too far along in construction to redesign sprinkler locations.

Are there any other municipalities that have adopted this code?

 Hi Elaine, A couple of quick questions for your situation.  Will these areas get a ceiling or will these segments of the ITS cabling be exposed?  Shared below is a link that you might consider viewing.

-Are the cables plenum rated in the areas were the ceiling is not already installed?

-How are the cable bundles supported?

http://www.maine.gov/dps/fmo/sprinklers/issues/wires.html

-Kevin J

 

A picture is worth a thousand words. 

Post #2713
Posted Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:27 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:00 PM
Posts: 2, Visits: 4
The plenum cables are in bundles that are secured directly to the deck using a Hilti Cable Clamp.  They are in a plenum space with a hard lid ceiling.  Seems as if the Fire Marshall is treating this as a combustible situation even though we are installing a limited combustible product.  Any other information you might have would be helpful.
Post #2718
Posted Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:27 PM


Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 9:14 PM
Posts: 431, Visits: 2,214
elaine_curry@neimanmarcus.com (2/11/2009)
The plenum cables are in bundles that are secured directly to the deck using a Hilti Cable Clamp.  They are in a plenum space with a hard lid ceiling.  Seems as if the Fire Marshall is treating this as a combustible situation even though we are installing a limited combustible product.  Any other information you might have would be helpful.

Good news Elaine,

You most likely won't have to pull back any cable just as long as it's "Plenum Rated."

The city of Bellevue along with the state has adopted the IFC and furthermore Bellevue might be tough on their inspections (with good reasons), but this makes for good construction.

I am actually shocked to find out that your AHJ didn't know "data cables" can be Plenum Rated.

I've heard of this before (when the permit falls to the plumber) as regards to additional sprinklers if and when needed in combustible space.  Although, I believe it's the ITS Installer's responsibility for those submittals (msds) and understanding of their AHJ's code adaptations.

Please send me an email and I will forward all necessary info for the solution to your situation.

Kevin J

 

A picture is worth a thousand words. 

Post #2722
Posted Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:39 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:41 PM
Posts: 1, Visits: 2
Kevin, I have the same issue with this new Fir code in the City of Bellevue can you email any information you have on this issue klangendorfer@lheg.net

Thanks

Kurt Langendorfer, RCDD

Post #6054
Posted Friday, May 20, 2011 3:57 AM


Forum Guru

Forum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum GuruForum Guru

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:41 AM
Posts: 121, Visits: 633
Kurt,

I don't know if you will be hearing from Kevin, he hasn't logged into this site since December 2009.

Joseph Golan, RCDD (Retired)

Palm Coast, FL

jpgolan-rcdd@earthlink.net

Post #6055
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 11:47pm

©2011 - BICSI, Inc. All rights reserved. Advertise With Us | Press Room | Legal Disclaimer | Vision | Antitrust | Ethics Information | FAQ